<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Alibaba · LLMobile.news</title><link>https://llmobile.news/tags/alibaba/</link><description>A concise news ticker covering AI on mobile devices, local models, apps and hardware.</description><language>en-GB</language><atom:link href="https://llmobile.news/tags/alibaba/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Alibaba adds 0.8B and 2B sizes to Qwen3.5, with 262K context and a vision encoder</title><link>https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3-5/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s Qwen team released Qwen3.5-0.8B and Qwen3.5-2B on March 2, 2026, together with 4B and 9B versions, according to the Qwen release notes. Both are dense vision-language models with a 262,144-token context and Apache 2.0 weights. The model card states that the released files work with Hugging Face Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and KTransformers, and that in light of the parameter scale the intended uses are prototyping, task-specific fine-tuning and other research or development purposes.
The benchmark table in that model card puts Qwen3.5-2B at 55.3 on MMLU-Pro with reasoning switched off, where the same table gives 40.2 for last generation&amp;amp;rsquo;s Qwen3-1.7B and 69.6 for the larger Qwen3-4B-2507, and Qwen3.5-0.8B at 29.7. With reasoning on, Alibaba reports 66.5 for the 2B and 42.3 for the 0.8B on the same test, and 51.6 against 11.9 on GPQA, a set of graduate-level science questions. The same table has Qwen3-1.7B ahead of both new sizes on IFEval, which checks whether a model obeys explicit formatting instructions, at 68.2 against 61.2 for the 2B and 52.1 for the 0.8B with reasoning off. Alibaba ran all of these figures itself.
Both sizes ship a vision encoder in the same checkpoint rather than as a separate release, and Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s vision table gives Qwen3.5-2B 64.2 on MMMU, a college-level image question set, above the 61.4 it lists for the previous Qwen3-VL-2B, with 49 for Qwen3.5-0.8B. The two models stack 24 layers in which three linear-attention blocks, whose memory cost does not grow with the sequence, alternate with one full-attention block. Input embedding and output layer are tied, so a single 248,320-entry matrix does both jobs, and Alibaba puts language coverage at 201 languages and dialects.
Alibaba published the weights on Hugging Face and ModelScope under Apache 2.0, and its MNN team put 4-bit exports of both sizes up the same day. The 0.8B build carries a 470 MB language weight file plus 63 MB for the vision encoder, and the 2B build 1.18 GB plus 196 MB, against 1.75 GB and 4.55 GB for the full-precision checkpoints. For other local runtimes the Qwen repository points readers to llama.cpp, which it says supports the series for text and vision, and to mlx-lm and mlx-vlm on Apple silicon, without Alibaba publishing GGUF or MLX builds of these sizes itself.
Source: https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B
Read the article: https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3-5/</description><category>Alibaba</category><category>Qwen</category><category>Open weights</category><category>Quantisation</category><category>Benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Alibaba releases GUI-Owl-1.5 agent models from 2B to 32B under MIT</title><link>https://llmobile.news/ticker/mobile-agent-v3-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.news/ticker/mobile-agent-v3-5/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 02:52:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s Tongyi Lab published Mobile-Agent-v3.5 on February 15, 2026, describing GUI-Owl-1.5, a family of agent models that read a screenshot and emit the next tap, type or scroll. The family spans 2B, 4B, 8B, 32B and 235B-A22B parameters in instruct and reasoning variants, all built on Qwen3-VL. Every benchmark in the paper was run server-side against cloud sandboxes and emulators, and the authors give no on-device deployment, latency or hardware figures anywhere, so the small sizes are the only thing that points at a phone. The authors write that the smaller instruct variants, which skip the reasoning step, are fast enough to be deployed on edge devices and to work alongside a larger cloud model.
Across platforms, the authors report their 32B-Instruct model reaching 56.5 on OSWorld-Verified for desktop tasks, 47.6 on OSWorld-MCP and 46.8 on Mobile-World, the last two of which also require calling external tools. On AndroidWorld, which scores an agent driving real Android apps in an emulator, their 8B reasoning model reaches 71.6, which the paper puts just behind UI-TARS-2 at 73.3. For browsers, the paper&amp;amp;rsquo;s table has the 32B reasoning model at 48.4 on WebArena, 46.6 on VisualWebArena and 82.1 on WebVoyager.
The small checkpoints carry a large part of that. The authors report 2B-Instruct at 43.5 on OSWorld-Verified and 67.9 on AndroidWorld, and 4B-Instruct at 48.2 and 69.8, which puts the 4B model within 2 points of their own 32B on Android tasks. On ScreenSpot-Pro, which tests whether a model can point at the right element in a high-resolution screenshot, they report 72.9 for 32B-Instruct and 80.3 when the model first crops a region and looks again. The paper&amp;amp;rsquo;s prose and its tables disagree on which variant owns several headline numbers, and the figures above follow the tables.
Charts: Alibaba Tongyi Lab, the authors&amp;amp;#39; own benchmark figures. Six checkpoints are on Hugging Face under the MIT license, covering 2B, 4B and 8B instruct, 8B reasoning, and 32B in both variants. The 235B-A22B model named in the paper is not among them. The code is MIT as well, and the repository points at a hosted cloud-sandbox demo rather than a local runtime.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16855
Read the article: https://llmobile.news/ticker/mobile-agent-v3-5/</description><category>Alibaba</category><category>Agents</category><category>Qwen</category><category>Open weights</category><category>Android</category></item><item><title>Alibaba gives Qwen3's 0.6B and 1.7B models a reasoning switch</title><link>https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 15:41:00 +0200</pubDate><description>Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s Qwen Team published the Qwen3 Technical Report on May 14, 2025, covering six dense models from 0.6B to 32B parameters and two mixture-of-experts models, where only part of the model is active per token. The two smallest dense sizes, Qwen3-0.6B and Qwen3-1.7B, carry the same mode switch as the rest of the family, so one set of weights either works through a problem step by step before answering or replies straight away. Alibaba reports Qwen3-1.7B scoring 93.4 on MATH-500, a 500-problem maths set, with reasoning on, against 73.0 with it off.
Earlier Qwen releases needed two separate models for that, a chat model and a dedicated reasoning model such as QwQ-32B. In Qwen3 the user picks the behaviour with a flag in the prompt or the system message, /think or /no_think, and the report states that reasoning is the default and that across a multi-turn conversation the model follows the last flag it saw. The same section describes a reasoning budget, where the model&amp;amp;rsquo;s working is cut off once it passes a token limit the user set and it answers from what it has so far, which the authors say they never trained for and which emerged from merging the two modes.
The benchmark tables give both small sizes in both modes. For Qwen3-0.6B, Alibaba reports 55.6 on MMLU-Redux, a corrected version of the MMLU knowledge test, with reasoning on against 44.6 with it off, and 77.6 against 55.2 on MATH-500. For Qwen3-1.7B the same pair of tables gives 73.9 and 64.4 on MMLU-Redux, 48.3 against 13.4 on the AIME 2024 competition maths set, and 33.2 against 11.6 on LiveCodeBench v5. Against the reasoning baselines in the report, Qwen3-0.6B is ahead of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B on MMLU-Redux, 55.6 to 45.4, and behind it on MATH-500, 77.6 to 83.9.
Alibaba built the small sizes by copying behaviour from the large ones rather than by running the full reinforcement learning pipeline on each. The report describes two stages of distillation from Qwen3-32B and Qwen3-235B-A22B, first on stored teacher outputs generated in both modes, then by matching the small model&amp;amp;rsquo;s output probabilities against the teacher&amp;amp;rsquo;s while the small model generates, and it credits the first stage with teaching the smaller models to switch modes at all. Pre-training ran on about 36 trillion tokens covering 119 languages and dialects, up from 29 in Qwen2.5.
Context length is where the two small sizes sit apart from the family. Table 1 of the report puts Qwen3-0.6B and Qwen3-1.7B at 32K tokens against 128K for Qwen3-8B and every larger model, and both tie the input embedding to the output layer so one weight matrix does both jobs. All eight models are published under the Apache 2.0 license on Hugging Face, ModelScope and Kaggle. The Qwen3 blog post of April 29, 2025 names Ollama, LM Studio, MLX, llama.cpp and KTransformers as the tools it recommends for running them locally.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388
Read the article: https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen-3/</description><category>Alibaba</category><category>Qwen</category><category>Open weights</category><category>Research</category><category>Benchmarks</category></item><item><title>Alibaba MNN runs 4-bit LLMs on phone CPUs and GPUs, with a multimodal Android app</title><link>https://llmobile.news/ticker/alibaba-mnn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.news/ticker/alibaba-mnn/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:30:00 +0100</pubDate><description>Alibaba published the first public build of its MNN-LLM Android app on January 23, 2025, a client that downloads open models and runs them entirely on the phone, covering text-to-text, image-to-text, audio-to-text and text-to-image generation through diffusion models. It sits on MNN, the inference and training framework Alibaba has kept open source since 2019 and uses in more than 30 of its own apps, among them Taobao, Youku and DingTalk. Alibaba reports the runtime prefilling 8.6 times faster than llama.cpp on an Android CPU, with decoding 2.3 times faster.
Models reach the device through llmexport, which converts a PyTorch checkpoint to ONNX and then to MNN&amp;amp;rsquo;s own format, splitting the weights into a separate file and quantising them to 4-bit or 8-bit by default, with block size configurable and 5-bit and 6-bit available through the MNNConvert tool. The same README lists Qwen, Gemma, Llama including TinyLlama and MobileLLM, Baichuan, Yi, DeepSeek, InternLM, Phi, ReaderLM and SmolLM as supported families. LoRA adapters can be merged into the base model at export or kept as a separate file that the runtime loads and swaps while running.
The MNN-LLM paper, presented at the ACM Multimedia Asia 2024 workshops, describes a DRAM-Flash split that leaves the embedding table, roughly 15% of the weights, in bfloat16 on flash storage and reads only the single token needed for each decode step. The authors put the saving for Qwen2 7B at about 2.18 GB of DRAM. Layers and the LM head stay in memory at int4 or int8 with asymmetric quantisation, computed as W4A8 or W8A8 on CPU and W4A16 or W8A16 on GPU, while the KV cache quantises keys to int4 or int8 and values to fp8 before spilling to flash with prefetching. The team measured the speed comparisons on a Xiaomi 14 against llama.cpp, MLC-LLM and fastllm, using Qwen2 1.5B, Qwen2 7B and Llama 3 8B.
Android builds run on the CPU with ARMv8.2 fp16 instructions and add an OpenCL path for the GPU, and the same runtime compiles for iOS with Metal, for macOS, Linux and Windows, and for browsers through WebAssembly. Alibaba distributes the app as a downloadable APK and warns that the first version was tested only on a OnePlus 13 and a Xiaomi 14 Ultra, so low-spec phones may run slowly or not at all. MNN is published under the Apache 2.0 license.
Diagram: Alibaba. The architecture overview from the MNN repository.
Source: https://github.com/alibaba/MNN
Read the article: https://llmobile.news/ticker/alibaba-mnn/</description><category>Alibaba</category><category>Android</category><category>Quantisation</category><category>Qwen</category><category>Open source</category></item><item><title>Alibaba builds Qwen2's 0.5B and 1.5B sizes for phones, earphones and glasses</title><link>https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen2/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:35:00 +0200</pubDate><description>Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s Qwen Team published the Qwen2 Technical Report on July 15, 2024, covering five models from 0.5B to 72B parameters. The report states that the two smallest, Qwen2-0.5B and Qwen2-1.5B, are designed for easy deployment on portable devices such as smartphones, earphones and smart glasses, while the larger sizes target GPUs. Qwen2-1.5B scores 56.5 on MMLU, a multiple-choice knowledge test, against 52.7 for Microsoft&amp;amp;rsquo;s Phi-2, which the same table credits with about twice the non-embedding parameters.
Both small sizes tie the input embedding to the output layer, so a single weight matrix does both jobs and the shared vocabulary of 151,646 tokens is stored once rather than twice. The report puts non-embedding parameters at 0.3B for Qwen2-0.5B and 1.2B for Qwen2-1.5B. All five models use grouped query attention, where several query heads share one set of key and value heads, with 14 query heads over 2 key-value heads at 0.5B and 12 over 2 at 1.5B, which the authors say lowers the key-value cache size per token against Qwen1.5 and with it the memory footprint during long-context inference.
Alibaba trained Qwen2-0.5B on a 12 trillion token dataset and the other dense models on a 7 trillion token one, reporting that the larger corpus did not pay off at the bigger sizes. For the instruction-tuned versions the report gives Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct 52.4 on MMLU, 61.6 on the GSM8K grade-school maths set and 29.0 on IFEval, which checks whether a model obeys explicit formatting instructions, against 37.9, 40.1 and 20.0 for Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct. The authors attribute the gain over the similarly sized Qwen1.5 models mainly to that data scaling.
Context length differs across the family. The authors tested retrieval from long documents with Needle in a Haystack and report that the two small models handle 32K tokens, Qwen2-57B-A14B-Instruct 64K, and the 7B and 72B instruction-tuned models 128K with the YARN extension applied. The pre-training data covers approximately 30 languages, among them English, Chinese, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, Russian, Korean, Japanese, Thai and Vietnamese.
Alibaba put the weights on Hugging Face and ModelScope. The Qwen2 blog post of June 7, 2024 states that Qwen2-0.5B, 1.5B, 7B and 57B-A14B carry the Apache 2.0 license while Qwen2-72B and its instruction-tuned variant stay on Alibaba&amp;amp;rsquo;s own Qianwen License, and it names MLX, llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio among the projects that run the models locally.
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10671
Read the article: https://llmobile.news/ticker/qwen2/</description><category>Alibaba</category><category>Qwen</category><category>Open weights</category><category>Research</category><category>Wearables</category></item></channel></rss>